

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() The 215 stands for the side wall width (215 mm). The 65 stands for the aspect ratio (65% of the 215 mm = the distance from the inside diameter of the tire to the ouside diameter. The 16 means a 16" rim.
245mm X .50(aspect ratio) = 122.5mm = 4.82"(inside diameter to outside) X 2 = 9.64". Add that to the rim diameter and you get about 25.6" tire diameter or 25.6" X 3.14 = 79.5" circumfrence. 215 X .65 = 139.75 = 5.50 X 2 =11. Add that to 16 you would have 27" tire dameter or 27 X 3.14 = 84.75 circumfrence. From what I calculate, the 215/65/16 would be somewhat taller. Aspect ratio makes a lot of difference in the diameter of the tire. Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
5 Lug Conversion Questions | Rosco | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-04-2004 11:36 PM |
What all do you need to do rear disc conversion w/ SN95 Parts | KG88GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-29-2003 01:45 PM |
Disc brake conversion | HRD | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 05-06-2002 03:59 PM |
disc conversion | rollin68 | Classic Mustangs | 12 | 11-07-2001 01:47 PM |
Baer vs. Ford 5-lug Disc Brake Conversion | RMARIANI | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-05-2001 03:18 PM |