MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-18-2005, 08:48 AM   #1
andy669
Registered Member
 
andy669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Moline Il
Posts: 901
Default Re: "Temporary" engine

.105 on the intake should be fine. Just make sure you have your stuff setup right. Where did you install the cam? You could back it up a couple few degrees and gain p~v on the intake, but you will lose a little on the exhaust.

Andy
__________________
88 coupe

91 LX NMRA Pure Street 5120
andy669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 09:28 AM   #2
~The Jester~
Rat Killer
 
~The Jester~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: "Temporary" engine

I installed the cam straight up at 0*, centerline is ground at 108.5 and it's actually at 107.8

I thought about the 4* retard/advance thing, but wasn't sure which way to go, if any, so I left it alone. Still easy enough to change, don't have the front cover on yet.
__________________
d-Con Racing
"Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!"

MICE need not apply.....

~The Jester~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 01:43 PM   #3
andy669
Registered Member
 
andy669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Moline Il
Posts: 901
Default Re: "Temporary" engine

Depending on how much compression you have, I'd tell you to advance that thing, but youre kinda out of room on the intake side. In which case I'd just leave it alone.

Andy
__________________
88 coupe

91 LX NMRA Pure Street 5120
andy669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 06:55 PM   #4
~The Jester~
Rat Killer
 
~The Jester~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: "Temporary" engine

DYNAMIC compression is guestimated at 11.43:1 Static is up around 13.2:1 so I see what you mean there.

Ran some tests on my desktop dyno, and with 1.7 rockers, and the cam retarted 4* is when it made the best power. 579HP at 7000. With the 1.6 rockers, and the cam at 0*, it's making 573HP at 7000.

So Me thinks due to the close tolerances on those pistons, and we're only talking about 6 HP, I'm gonna go straight up on the cam, and 1.6 rockers.

Sound logical?

Here she is all "mocked" up:
__________________
d-Con Racing
"Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!"

MICE need not apply.....


Last edited by ~The Jester~; 05-18-2005 at 09:03 PM..
~The Jester~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Mustangs....Got One? 1969Mach1 Blue Oval Lounge 22 09-25-2010 04:59 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Classic Mustangs 8 06-16-2005 11:43 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Small Ponies 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Racer's Club House 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.


SEARCH