

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
![]() The 5.0L is a great engine and very durable.
The pre-1993 (stock) 5.0L V-8 HP rating was 225, Torque was 300 lb/ft and the compression ratio was 9.0 (used regular gas). The 5.0 had Mass Air, EFI (Electronic Fuel Injection) and standard ignition (has a distributor). 5.0 liters of displacement translates to 302 cubic inches, which is a very decent displacement size...not too big - or too tiny. The later Mustang V-8's are a 4.6L displacement or 281 cubic inches, just as a comparison. Gas mileage isn't great (in the high teens, usually) but the performance makes up for that. Highly recommended engine, even in a Bronco.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner 1990 - 2005 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
68 Mustang Engine Swap pulley problems | kirkdickinson | Classic Mustangs | 10 | 07-13-2008 07:45 PM |
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA | JAGraff | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:43 AM |
engine questions for a 66 mustang | daccrow86 | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 09-17-2003 07:44 PM |
Stupid Question? | SilverGT02 | Modular Madness | 4 | 07-06-2002 11:01 AM |
Engine Shifting into radiator and also clucth broke | Stuffie0912 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 12-03-2001 03:26 AM |