MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-28-2005, 02:44 PM   #5
Capri306
Moderator
 
Capri306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
Default Update

UPDATE: The XE274HR showed no improvement whatsoever over any of the forementioned camshafts, at least on my simulation. In fact, the shape of the torque curve is like the E303, but about 5% LOWER across the entire band.

See the attachment.

Again, it's hard to tell for sure without knowing the exact profile of the camshaft, but I think my simulations have shown the limits for unported GT40P heads. A cleanup of the ports may well be justified; I will attempt to find reliable flow numbers and try the simulation again. Stay tuned.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg XE274vsE303.JPG (94.8 KB, 8 views)
__________________
Capri306, Moderator
The Mustang Works Online

1979 Mercury Capri
1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback
1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco
Capri306 is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What kind of Windsor heads? vetteeatr Windsor Power 11 10-28-2001 03:43 AM
For whoever it was considering using stock ported heads 2FastLX Windsor Power 5 10-11-2001 01:53 PM
TFS guides, lost power, and dyno numbers exgmguy Windsor Power 9 05-09-2001 09:41 PM
is there any difference between 351C heads and 351M heads tireburner163 Windsor Power 7 03-09-2001 09:26 PM
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? gt93mustang Windsor Power 14 03-06-2001 07:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 PM.


SEARCH