Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
11-14-2005, 10:29 PM
|
#5 |
|
a nightmare conversion...
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 10
|
Re: powerdyne or paxton...10:1 compression..
I'm having some hood clearance issues with my supercharger (Paxton Novi-1000). Would anyone know if there is a tubular K-member and engine/trans mounts that sit the engine a little further down and back towards the firewall?
Also, I have a '90 motor and pulleys in a '95 mustang, so I know I need the '95 tubular K-member, but would the '95 engine mounts work with the '90 motor? I know they can be(?) different, but I see a lot of engine mounts advertised as 87-95. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| #1 @ TDC on compression stroke? | 302 LX Eric | Windsor Power | 1 | 09-23-2003 04:19 PM |
| Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
| Powerdyne Supercharger for 87 GT without AC question | gramsch | Windsor Power | 1 | 05-06-2001 02:58 PM |
| Paxton vs Powerdyne? | Stang_ROTY | Windsor Power | 5 | 03-14-2001 02:22 AM |
| high or low compression engines | Mustangboy89 | Windsor Power | 6 | 01-26-2001 03:04 PM |