
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 41
|
Ok, screw it, i'm going hydraulic flat tappet, why? because I really don't care, I'm only interested in making around 350hp, it's a freshly rebuilt 302 .30 over with TRW 9:1, forged rods, I wanted to run Trick Flow twisted wedge heads, Trick flow reccomended the stage 1 cam for my application, i was using the above motor with manual,4.10 gears, they also said that the trick flow heads on a stock shortblock could only run a maximum of .540" lift and with 9:1 compression only use up to 225degrees of duration @ .05", I was going to stick hydraulic flat tappet and use a cam of equivelant specs, i was looking at COMP CAMS Magnum series cams, part # 35-414-3, specs: 270degree duration, 224degrees at .05"lift, .500/.500" lift 110degree LSA, it seems that this cam is of almost identical specs as the Trick flow stage 1, I understand that it's comparing apples to oranges from roller to non roller, but am I correct do you think in my cam choice, does this look like a sufficient cam for my application, I think it's pretty conservative, but I'm not greedy,
If I am sticking flat tappet, i guess i have to order matching non roller pushrods that are a bit longer than the roller ones right? I have to run hardened for the Trick flow heads with guideplates. I guess the choice for lifters will be easy now. Let me know what you guys think, I apreciate all your time and advice!
__________________
88 Lx project. 96 Z28 daily driver. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Import Slayer
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
|
I think the cam is a little on the conservative side, like you said.
Honestly, if you like the Comp Cams, I would look at the 280* Magnum or their XE series like the 284XE. I have the 274XE in my engine and I think that's not enough for my setup. I should have have 284XE also or maybe the 294XE. A tech guy from Comp Cams told me the 274XE cam is more aggressive than the 280 Magnum because it has more aggressive ramp rates than the 280. I was also told that Ford engines like duel pattern profiles that favor the exhaust side. Since you're going to have adjustable valvetrain, why not consider a solid flat tappet cam? You'll make a little bit more power with properly matched solid cam than with hydraulic. I made the mistake of porting and polishing my stock heads without spending the extra money on converting to adjustable rockers so that I could run solid cams. I guess if I did that though, I would be better off buying a set of aftermarket heads.......
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1.72 Roller Rocker Questions | 83GTMUSTANG | Windsor Power | 9 | 06-04-2005 12:35 AM |
| Roller Rockers for my AFR's.....and install questions | dragstang86 | Windsor Power | 4 | 12-31-2002 08:18 PM |
| milling e7tes and 1.7 roller rockers.....questions | Old Guy with 87 GT | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-01-2002 11:38 PM |
| Roller Rocker Install Questions! | chris91LX | Windsor Power | 2 | 11-12-2001 09:03 PM |
| Roller Rocker install questions. (long) | chris91LX | Windsor Power | 5 | 03-15-2001 09:32 PM |
