

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2
|
![]() depends on what you're planning on doing with the car... driver? show? secial occ, etc. if it's a driver, i'd go with the windsor. parts are readily available (because ford is still building them). good hp, and actually if you show the car occasionally, say cruise nites, etc. it's the right engine for the year. clevelands didn't show up til 70.
cleveland was built for the power the windsor was lacking. so if it's going to be an occasional driver (very occasional) go for the C. lots more money though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2
|
![]() depends on what you're doing with the car...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351C vs 351W | stvneil | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-29-2004 10:25 AM |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap | IeatZ28 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-06-2001 12:45 AM |
351W or 351C? | A Wild Neg | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-26-2001 03:35 PM |
351W vs 351C | Five0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-26-2001 08:18 PM |