1.6 rr's vs 1.7 rr's

[Rev]

Originally Posted by rwhite65

Some of the guys will argue the added stress of the 1.7's to the valvetrain is not worth it. I have 1.7's, but put this all together from scratch, so cant tell ya how it did with 1.6's or anything like that.
Ryan

Glad to hear that those 1.7 RR's are doing OK, Ryan.

I actually went from 1.7 RR's back to 1.6 RR's when I changed cams. My application is for a flat tappet rather than a roller cam. I changed cams going to .509/.512 lift. I really didn't want much more than that with a flat tappet, so I sold the 1.7's to Ryan.

With roller lifters, you can tolerate steeper valve lifts without stressing the valve train as much as long as you have adequate piston/valve clearance and as long as you have adequate valve springs. "Adequate" is the key word here.

My belief is that a little over .500 valve lifts is OK, and does not compromise longevity of the cam/valve train for a street driven car. "More's law" states that "more is not always better" and may apply here.

Rev

[bailey_57]

thanks alot guys, you just saved me a couple bucks that i can put toward lca's and drag radials.
jay

[rwhite65]

As Rev pointed out, he had the 1.7's and helped me out when I needed some rockers for the new set up. The 1.7's might help a little, but I personally would say use the moeny in another area of the car, or better yet, save that money towards a better set of heads.
I have yet to run my new combo, but I will tell you the "seat of the pants" feeling has gotten me wanting even better heads now!
Rev - Sure did work out, thanks again!Hoping to get it tuned good, had a stumble off idle last year when I put it up. I think with the boards help I may have it figured out.
Ryan