MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-03-2006, 09:01 PM   #7
DeltaMustang65
Knuckle-Basher
 
DeltaMustang65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 249
Default Re: Old school engine rebuilding wisdom welcome here

Ok. Call me crazy but I think it'd be sweet to be able to say I've got stock heads and still be fairly fast (fast enough to spank these ricers even harder, and those annoying monkeys in their stock 5.0s). I also kinda hope I can keep my block virgin, but yeah, I know sometimes you need to bore it over just to keep the cylinder nice and straight.

Let's say I get some new aluminum heads. I will paint them, of course, but since it's a common thing to do these days I doubt anyone that knows the first thing about cars will be fooled. I should still have them ported and polished, right? What about any other work, is it needed or would the performance gain be too small to justify the cost of labor? The only bad thing I've heard about aluminum heads is that they don't mate well with iron blocks. Or maybe it had something to do with the gasket too, I forgot. Has anyone heard of this issue?

Just a couple more things for now.

Does anyone happen to know the difference in output of the 289 with stock worked-up heads and the same 289 with aluminum heads out of the box or with the average port job? (This is of course assuming that the hypothetical 289s' other parts would be the same and also that they would be optimized for use with aluminum heads)That would go a long way in helping me decide what route I should go.

And...

Would stock worked-up heads be too much of a bottleneck to justify a roller cam? I'm assuming that they're pretty much the best option for aluminum heads here, but if I'm wrong, by all means let me know.

Thanks all.
DeltaMustang65 is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1968 engine numbers, 289 or 302? andybud Classic Mustangs 5 09-11-2003 12:14 PM
raced a Supra Twin Turbo Stang35th Stang Stories 63 08-23-2003 12:36 AM
Rebuilt Engine Problems sleeperstang Classic Mustangs 6 05-08-2003 10:19 AM
Engine rebuilding advice starrparker Classic Mustangs 7 08-26-2001 06:21 PM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Racer's Club House 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.


SEARCH