
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
If you're looking at the Mustang, I would have to say yes. The V-8 engined Mustangs are historically more reliable than their V6 counterparts.
The V-8 cars generally have superior running gear and higher end components while base models receive cheaper parts to keep prices low. Also, the Mustang used the same basic mainstream V8 engine (260-289-302) from 1965-1995. Ford was pretty familiar with how to build the variants of the 5.0. The 4.6L saw action in other models for at least 4 years prior to its introduction into the Mustang as well. Unfortunately the 3.8L V-6, which was notoriously problematic throughout the 1990s, didn't benefit from being in use for more than a decade. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How reliable are the new 4.6 motors? | LS1JAY | Blue Oval Lounge | 11 | 02-11-2003 02:50 PM |
| How reliable is a 5.0 | vtechatch | Windsor Power | 30 | 01-03-2003 09:51 AM |
| 393 or 408 more reliable? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 20 | 12-07-2002 12:31 PM |
| reliable heads | evilmustang | Windsor Power | 5 | 06-14-2001 09:47 AM |
| Reliable Zex nitrous results are in!! | Hammer | Modular Madness | 4 | 06-06-2000 02:11 PM |
