
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
|
since you want some track numbers, how about 12.28@108 with ported stock E7s and ported stock "junk" intake. What does that put the HP at?
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=843938 need we go on?
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss 88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE). http://www.fastlanecars.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
Quote:
I seen a car with a pretty much stock motor run a 13.10 @102mph @3000ft here were I am at. He had a little port work done to the exhaust side of his heads, ported lower intake, exhaust and 3.73 gears. He hurt alot of LS1 owners feelings that night. On my car my heads are really too big for a 302 thats why I can do 109mph but at only a 12.50. But thats not bad considering cars run a half second better and 3 or 4 mph more in Dallas or Houston compared to west Texas were I am at. I am hoping my heads will be a better match with the 331 I have on order. ![]()
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Sounds like it's around the right area, depending on the weight of the vehicle... might have helped to note the intake was professionally ported
![]() I don't give a flying **** what you think. I've seen far more bullshit on this board than I care to acknowledge; from people claiming to be somebody they're not to cars putting down 350rwhp and trapping 105. I find it interesting that your combo is listed as GT-40P's with a 4* retarded stock cam, a ported Explorer intake, 1.7 roller rockers, and you managed about 15 crank hp less than the "stock" combo at 277rwhp on the dyno. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
|
Quote:
interesting that you pull a my **** is bigger than yours type comment on my car. It's a daily driver that I don't race - and the cam is 4 degrees advanced, not retarded. Peak numbers don't mean squat to me - average torque does.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss 88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE). http://www.fastlanecars.com/ |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dyno'd my Stock '03 Cobra - 386 RWHP | NO SLO PK | Modular Madness | 9 | 05-05-2003 08:54 PM |
| New 5.0 coming - Est. RWHP | B2r3y | Windsor Power | 13 | 02-26-2003 05:10 PM |
| 03 Cobra makes 400 rwhp and runs 11's!! | Stang_Crazy | Blue Oval Lounge | 15 | 07-15-2002 08:42 AM |
| Stock RWHP on 94 GT? | Whoapony94 | Windsor Power | 11 | 04-08-2002 03:15 PM |
| Is 209 rwhp Ok for my mods? | GTLee | Windsor Power | 14 | 08-13-2001 10:25 AM |
