Is 350 RWHP Possible ?

[Unit 5302]

Sounds like it's around the right area, depending on the weight of the vehicle... might have helped to note the intake was professionally ported

I don't give a flying **** what you think. I've seen far more bullshit on this board than I care to acknowledge; from people claiming to be somebody they're not to cars putting down 350rwhp and trapping 105.

I find it interesting that your combo is listed as GT-40P's with a 4* retarded stock cam, a ported Explorer intake, 1.7 roller rockers, and you managed about 15 crank hp less than the "stock" combo at 277rwhp on the dyno.

[tmoss]

Originally Posted by Unit 5302

I don't give a flying **** what you think.

I find it interesting that your combo is listed as GT-40P's with a 4* retarded stock cam, a ported Explorer intake, 1.7 roller rockers, and you managed about 15 crank hp less than the "stock" combo at 277rwhp on the dyno.

ditto on the first comment, your a class guy I can tell.

interesting that you pull a my **** is bigger than yours type comment on my car. It's a daily driver that I don't race - and the cam is 4 degrees advanced, not retarded. Peak numbers don't mean squat to me - average torque does.