MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-10-2006, 02:57 PM   #1
tmoss
Registered Member
 
tmoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
Default Re: Is 350 RWHP Possible ?

My work has worked out well for many and I've got a little national ink, but that is a far cry from celebrity. Thanks though. I just couldn't stand by and not respond to a flat out statement that something couldn't happen - that I have seen happen numerous times.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss
88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE).

http://www.fastlanecars.com/
tmoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2006, 08:02 PM   #2
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Default Re: Is 350 RWHP Possible ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tmoss
My work has worked out well for many and I've got a little national ink, but that is a far cry from celebrity. Thanks though. I just couldn't stand by and not respond to a flat out statement that something couldn't happen - that I have seen happen numerous times.
I pretty much left this topic because I had no desire to get into a who has the prettiest smelling shit contest, but it seems as though you think you've somehow quashed my comments, yet I still don't really see where we've disagreed in theory because in each example you've given, something is different than I've quoted (i.e. ported intakes vs stock intakes).

Telling people that (A) is possible or (B) is possible based on a somewhat misleading claim isn't right. i.e. a professional porting job is not a shitty home port job, and a stock intake is not a professionally ported stock intake. Maybe we've got a communication breakdown in the terminology department.

Regardless, I stand firmly by my comments in this thread, and I feel completely at ease doing so. Taking my comments out of context or bending them to apply to a different scenario isn't fair to me or the people relying on your advice to build their combination with the expectations their (A) combo will be capable of (B) performance. I'm not about to blow sunshine up somebody's ass, and that is worth more to me in the "class act" category than even unintentionally misleading people to make them feel better.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dyno'd my Stock '03 Cobra - 386 RWHP NO SLO PK Modular Madness 9 05-05-2003 08:54 PM
New 5.0 coming - Est. RWHP B2r3y Windsor Power 13 02-26-2003 05:10 PM
03 Cobra makes 400 rwhp and runs 11's!! Stang_Crazy Blue Oval Lounge 15 07-15-2002 08:42 AM
Stock RWHP on 94 GT? Whoapony94 Windsor Power 11 04-08-2002 03:15 PM
Is 209 rwhp Ok for my mods? GTLee Windsor Power 14 08-13-2001 10:25 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


SEARCH