MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-01-2000, 10:17 PM   #36
make7UPYOURS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

i still disagree and stand by what i said earlier. shaggy's car has better heads and more mods than mine but ive done my homework and an open spacer on a dual plane does nothing but hurt performance. its a cheap mod though so go ahead, i love to learn things on my own too. an "upgrade" to a c-6 isnt necessary when ive seen c-4's run behind big block cars with more power than most wild small blocks. why add the weight? i would also stay with 2.5" exaust at the largest. ive seen too many guys put 3" pipes on their car only to run slower because they killed the flow velocity of the headers not allowing them to scavenge the cylinders. the whole engine is a system, if something doesnt match the combination, you'll never see its power potential. also i woulnt overcarb a smallblock with 700 cfm, especially not manual secondaries with an automatic. oh well. it just like they say.....ask a question, get a conflicting answer between every gearhead.

------------------
67stang coupe, carb on 5.0, 4 speed, 4.11's....8.41 @ 83mph in 1/8 wanting 7's
  Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.


SEARCH