MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-01-2001, 05:22 PM   #27
COBRA66
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Central Valley, Ca
Posts: 58
Post

Well i have no idea y you would want a 71-73, cause they are the ugliest of mustangs, besides mustang II. The last year of the good looking classics has got to be 70'. You just cant beet the looks and performance of the 69-70 Mach 1's or boss cars. But i would have to agree with and earlier post about 64.5-66, you can get one at resonable price, and the 289 has got to be one of the most potent engines ever built. Not to mention the fact that its cheap for hp, seeing as how most of the go fast guys are driving 5.0's. And 302 parts are interchangable with 289, with some exceptions such as early 289's(ie 64) Being a classic owner i would go for the classic, they just look sharp and women lov'm. But if your goals are to go fast and handle well, i would have to say the market is a little better for the fox bodied mustangs, (87-93 that is).
COBRA66 is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
any way i can get under 9 seconds in the 1/8 Bigcarguy65 Modular Madness 8 11-03-2001 09:35 PM
Original Gone... 60 seconds on Speedvision Stefan Blue Oval Lounge 3 09-23-2001 09:16 AM
gone in 60 seconds 82 GT Blue Oval Lounge 15 01-15-2001 02:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.


SEARCH