

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 278
|
![]() Either way, you will need a new transmission, driveshaft, rear axle, and you will want to switch to 5-lug hubs from the 4-lug that comes on 6cyl cars. I would recommend the 302 over the 351C just because performance parts are much easier to get for the 302 due to the 5.0's popularity. You can get aluminum heads for a 302 very cheap now.
You may want to think about a 351W, It uses the same heads as a 302, but with some extra cubes. ------------------ 67 Fastback - Arctic White Pearl paint 351W ,Trick Flow Aluminum Heads, Edelbrock TorkerII, Comp. Cam, Performance Automatic C-4 Trans, 3.55 gears, Front Disc Brakes, 1-1/8" Fr. 3/4" rear sway bars. My 351W Fastback ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1970 351C 4bbl low plane 2x4 intake | jwmustangin | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 04-17-2002 01:27 PM |
351W or 351C? | A Wild Neg | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-26-2001 03:35 PM |
351C swap???????? | vande97 | Windsor Power | 0 | 04-14-2001 05:22 PM |
Is it worth it 351C to 460 | ASMO | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 04-09-2001 05:37 AM |
Stock 70 351C 4V 4sp 1/4 times? | MrWesson22 | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 01-14-2001 02:22 AM |