

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: ventura,CA
Posts: 438
|
![]() Do you remember the saying "There's no replacement for displacement"? A 302 will fit anywhere a 289 will and will make more power. The 289 needs a heck of a lot of RPM to make power. I'd stick with a 302 unless you're trying to have the original engine in an old stang. However it is cool when you smoke a Chevy and tell them they got ate by a 289
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|