

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Central Valley, Ca
Posts: 58
|
![]() personally in a classic car i prefer the 289, granted that there is no substitute for cubic inches. But in my opinion i find the 289 to a stronger engine, maybe it has something to do with the thicker cylinder walls. All a 302 is, is a punched out 289. They are the same block. And to add a little history to it, Shelby originally ran 289's with a 3x2 setup.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|