

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 18
|
![]() I can't say anything about which would be better for your setup, but I can tell you that I know a couple of guys who bought RPM's for nearly stock vehicles and did not lose any considerably low end torque.
------------------ 95 GT, k&n with removed silencer, dynomax ultra-flo ss mufflers, eibach pro progressive springs |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Performer RPM | -RootS- | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-25-2003 06:24 PM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Performer RPM vs RPM Air Gap | Phantom5oh | Windsor Power | 17 | 01-10-2002 04:19 PM |
PERFORMER RPM OR GT 40 | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-23-2001 09:22 PM |