Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
04-17-2001, 05:35 PM
|
#9 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Jose, California USA
Posts: 275
|
Why are you complaining? 5.0 kick 4.6 *** all the time. Period. The 5.0 is superior in everyway. Period. End of discussion.
Okay Im just kidding, wanted to see what a ricer felt like. I hate when they write "period". As to the race, it's obvious he was running NOS. It takes several mods to run with the '99+ 4.6s especially on the top end. My brother ran against a CRX once in his '94 Caprice (LT1, high 14 car) and the CRX smoked him. The guy in the CRX skirted the tires more in second than he was capable in first and still more in third than he did in first and then was saying "it's all engine" but wouldn't show us the trunk or open the hood. ------------------ 1993 Mustang GT - March Ram Air & Pullies, K&N, C&L 73mm MAF, Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2 in. mandrel bent cat back, High Flow H-Pipe, Pro 5.0 Shifter, 16* Timing Advance |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please Help!! - 4.6L Prob.s | 98gt5sp | Modular Madness | 2 | 07-09-2002 08:57 AM |
| 5.0L vs 4.6L comparison | tchm | Windsor Power | 3 | 07-22-2001 09:07 PM |
| New 4.6L Tbird, parts? | 91LX2Bfast | Modular Madness | 0 | 10-11-2000 03:54 PM |
| Installing a 4.6L inna 62 Falcon Futura | 62falcon/4.6LCobraConver | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 05-20-1999 06:58 PM |
| Installing a 4.6L in a 62 Falcon Futura | 62falcon/4.6LCobraConver | Small Ponies | 0 | 05-20-1999 06:50 PM |