
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
|
jonnyk, we actually talked about this point in the other, longer thread. In a nutshell, I agreed that we don't know which is accurate, but that's the problem. Tools that measure the same item should get the same results. turbolx also mentioned that the Mustang Dyno uses strain gauges and the DynoJet uses a known mass which essentially makes a DynoJet more like a balance and a Mustang Dyno more like a scale. I do think that it would be optimal if the DynoJet had a known mass that was the same mass as the vehicle you are testing.
You can read more about this in the other thread. Just so you know, I have an e-mail into MustangDyne.com to see if there are any nearby since I plan to use one if they are. Not to get a HP reading, but for tuning purposes. ------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
| Yellow Mustang Stampede TULSA OK August 17 | stylin99 | Ford Show & Go | 2 | 11-09-2004 11:19 PM |
| t-5, is it the same in the 4 cylinder and V8 | ex-lt1-guy | Windsor Power | 12 | 03-03-2002 01:59 AM |
| 89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang | Five0 | Stang Stories | 7 | 04-01-2001 02:50 AM |
| Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. | Taqus | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 01-17-2001 02:39 AM |
