MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-26-2001, 11:11 PM   #30
MiracleMax
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
Post

Well they were good for their day. Seems to me Ford fell victim to the bigger is better syndrome back then when it came to designing intake ports. They are still a bit behind the times today. Especially when you take into account engines like the LS1 which only uses 2 valves, but the sohc mod motor looks more promising everyday. To bad they decided to dump their pushrod motors.

A buddy of mine is cracking 10.20-10.30's in a 3500 lbs SS Z-28 using a 250 shot of giggle gas, a cam, a bit more compression, and a little head work.

, but I digress , I think the Boss 302 would be a pig with a auto and those huge heads which are designed for a high, high reving engine. Fortunately the cleveland style head proved to be an evolutionary dead end. Although ford still does use a canted valve head on the V-6 motors with a more sensible intake port volume.

MiracleMax is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Mustangs....Got One? 1969Mach1 Blue Oval Lounge 22 09-25-2010 04:59 AM
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs Mach1 Cobra Jet Classic Mustangs 20 07-11-2005 08:06 PM
Boss Mustang stacy's stang Modular Madness 7 03-17-2004 06:27 AM
´68-70 mach I´s best vintage Mustangs? Or boss 302? Racer Classic Mustangs 11 08-04-2001 11:07 PM
Boss and shinoa mustangs? stng87 Windsor Power 3 04-22-2001 10:32 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.


SEARCH