

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Here's my opinion:
'89-'92 LX 5.0L notchback (not the hatchback) Here's why: Speed density fuel metering system adapts better to modifications ('89+ 5.0L's all have speed density, which measures the incoming air rather than calculating it) Notchback is a bit lighter than the hatchback and a hell of a lot stiffer (which is the fox mustang's weakness anyways) Better brakes than the pre-'87 (not sure on when mustangs first came with 10" rotors rather than 9") and also 10" drums on the stronger 8.8" rear axle. stock these cars could easily run low 14's and were the car of choice for the police package because of the lighter weight and frame rigidity. Good luck on your purchase! ------------------ '84 Mustang 5.0 LX My car |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
Do you think SVT will strike gold with the new supercharged, 390HP 2003 Mustang Cobra | StangFlyer | Blue Oval Lounge | 86 | 04-08-2004 03:33 PM |
t-5, is it the same in the 4 cylinder and V8 | ex-lt1-guy | Windsor Power | 12 | 03-03-2002 01:59 AM |
89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang | Five0 | Stang Stories | 7 | 04-01-2001 02:50 AM |
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. | Taqus | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 01-17-2001 02:39 AM |