Should I sell my stang and get a notchback???

Five0 · 08-12-2001, 09:12 AM

I am not positive but I think the gt40-x heads are the better ones but the p heads will work fine also.
I had my butt whipped by a mustang with gt40x heads and a lot of other mod’s but still N/A; he ran a 12.2 to my 12.5 in the 1/4 mi.
I run canfield heads but they are too big for the little 302 and that only goes to show that a properly matched combo will run better than the more expensive combo if not properly matched.

The reason I bought the canfields is because I was making more room for future mod’s and the canfields really shine with more cubic inches or a blower.
After the heads I would look into an intake because after the heads, that will be the biggest bottleneck in your combo.

Thanks for the link stang runner, That is some good info.
------------------
James Cox
nochevy@hotmail.com
1991 Mustang LX
12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft

[This message has been edited by Five0 (edited 08-12-2001).]

08-12-2001, 09:12 AM	#8
Five0 Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: middleburg, fl, usa Posts: 1,134	I am not positive but I think the gt40-x heads are the better ones but the p heads will work fine also. I had my butt whipped by a mustang with gt40x heads and a lot of other mod’s but still N/A; he ran a 12.2 to my 12.5 in the 1/4 mi. I run canfield heads but they are too big for the little 302 and that only goes to show that a properly matched combo will run better than the more expensive combo if not properly matched. The reason I bought the canfields is because I was making more room for future mod’s and the canfields really shine with more cubic inches or a blower. After the heads I would look into an intake because after the heads, that will be the biggest bottleneck in your combo. Thanks for the link stang runner, That is some good info. ------------------ James Cox nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX 12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft [This message has been edited by Five0 (edited 08-12-2001).]