Hybrid Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
12-29-1999, 05:10 PM
|
#1 |
|
AKA "Dr. Evil"
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: South Fork Ranch
Posts: 1,721
|
Well,
The X-pipe seems to be all the rage these days, and I have yet to see someone who has been dis-satisfied with one. I myself will be in the market for an x/h pipe later this year (2000, when my 5.0 rebuild is complete). So needless to say I will have to save the cash back up...;-) Point I'm trying to get at is that while the X-pipe seems to be a great addition, its price can be quite a lot more than a similiar after-market H-pipe..... and I have yet to see any real side by side stats on just how much more effective they are compared to say.. oh... a MAC H-pipe with Hi-flow cats... Does anyone have any stats like that? ------------------ 98 GT Dyno-Max cat-back exhaust, 3.73 gears, Steeda shifter, Ford Motorsport Underdrive pullies, 87mm MAF and Roush cold air kit... |
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| California Smog legal X or H pipe | shawv | Modular Madness | 1 | 05-08-2002 05:51 PM |
| Off road pipe vs. Catalitic Pipe | Kamaro Killer | Windsor Power | 7 | 04-04-2002 04:05 AM |
| Just failed Emissions test! | Chevyguy | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-13-2002 05:33 PM |
| Mac H pipe w cats vs BBK x pipe with cats?? | Chevyguy | Windsor Power | 15 | 11-16-2001 08:34 AM |
| X 0r H Pipe comparison tests? | Ripper | Modular Madness | 4 | 09-26-2001 04:48 PM |