

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
|
![]() If It Ware Me, Id Go Turbo. If You Dont Have A Heavy Foot (Yeah Right, Your In A Stang) The Turbo Wont Bother Daily Driving Until You Rev It Up. The Turbo Is The Closest Thing To Free Power (Driven By Exhaust Gasses, Not Using The Engines Power To Spin A Belt), & The Incon Kit Comes Complete With Everything Except E7ZZ Engine Mounts (Required For The Extra Power). Ive Priced Them Out Myself & They Are Almost The Same Price!!! With The Kenne Bell, You Need A New Fuel System & Mass-Air, But That Stuff Is Included In The Incon Kit. The Incon Has An Intercooler, & The Kit Can Produce 800hp+ (28psi) On A Race Motor, Or You Can Turn Down The Boost & Go Crusin (7psi). The Incon Comes With Water Cooled Turbos So Theirs No Cookin Of The Oil. A Turbo Is The Way To Go, But Either Way Is Fine.
Later.... ------------------ 1988 Mustang GT, T-5 No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box, Removed air silendcer), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!). My Stang This Is What Dynomax Ultra-Flo's Do |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
supercharger vs. turbo | 6 banger | Small Ponies | 4 | 08-15-2002 06:10 PM |
Ran a turbo Integra, a Grand National, and two bikes!!! | WhiteT78Supra | Stang Stories | 23 | 07-19-2002 07:21 AM |
TurboCharger vs Supercharging | StangGT02 | Modular Madness | 4 | 07-09-2002 12:01 PM |
Turbo vs. Supercharger vs Other on 93 cobra | Sonics2042 | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-04-2002 08:36 PM |
turbo or supercharger | 300hp99GT | Modular Madness | 6 | 09-08-2001 11:47 PM |