Ls1 in a Mustang???

[Unit 5302]

Originally posted by MidNiteBlu 5.0
...saying someone bashes mustangs just because they own cars that aren't Fords. Oh yeah I haven't seen one thread where 1BAD89 dissed Mustangs. Just stop all this ***king bullsh*t.

I suggest you read ANY post on the stock performance of any Mustang. If Okieboy posted on it, it will be some wacked out time a second slower than what it really is. Then he'll begin babbling on about how unbelievably fast his LS1 is, and how no Mustang without major mods could ever touch it, and if it did have the mods to hang with the LS1 through the 1/8, he'd be blowing it away after that. If it could possibly beat his LS1 (which takes a 10sec Mustang), then it's gotta be a tubbed out, unstreetable vehicle, and then he simply points out how much faster and badder his S-10 is.

I don't have to be the fastest guy on the boards, that's good, 'cause just like him, I'm not.

BTW, I for some reason had a brain fart; maybe I was looking at your spelling error, Okieboy?

Putting a 350 Chevy into a Mustang is stupid. Why not put an engine in worth a ****? Maybe they are redneck's that have never seen an engine other than a 350 Chevy? They might not know that there are other engines out there. My dad had a '46 Buick engine in a '46 Ford back in the 50's that he ran low/mid 13's with. Do I think that was cool? Not especially, but for me those older cars are street rod material so it's not as offensive. They may not have been so old back then, but too early for me to care. I'm so damn tired of seeing 350's in everything. They are actually dumb enough to put 350's in to ******* motorcycles now. The POS is known as a Boss Hoss. My friend makes money off dynoing the damn things all the time. Just sickening. Ever try to lift one of those heaps up after it falls off the dyno?