![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: wi
Posts: 62
|
![]() I have a mild 351 I'm switching to fuel injection. I found a gt40 with a 351 lower for $400 is that a good deal? and could you please tell me the pros and cons to the gt40 intake
thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Pro: Flows better than a stock intake.
Con: Flows better than a stock intake. Pro: $400 is a pretty good price. Con: $400 for what you get isn't all that great. Pro: Building a mild 351 will require a different intake than stock. Con: It will probably require a better intake than the GT40, stock. Pro: You can port intakes for better flow. Con: You cannot port the GT40 upper due to thin castings. Pro: The GT40 intake has long runners that work well for building torque on a small displacement V8 like the 302. Con: The 351 doesn't need that kind of help and the long style runners hurt it's upper rpm performance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: wi
Posts: 62
|
![]() think you answered my question. think the tfs is a better choice?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Yep. I haven't heard if Holley is making a 351W intake yet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
motors done......woohooo
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 799
|
![]() unit, i have a hogged out rpm intake on my 95 do you think the tfs track heat or the holley will flow better?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Gordonville MO USA
Posts: 448
|
![]() Just on the of chance you can score a 302 intake cheap, like an efi Performer, here's something you might be interested in:
http://www.pricemotorsport.com/ Also, the Explorer 302 intake flows better than the GT, about equal to the Cobra, and can be had cheap at the right junkyard and could be used with those adapters. Here's some info: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/F.../Explorer.html http://www.stormpages.com/saleen90181/explorer.htm http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/..._overload.html I'm looking at the same situation on a limited budget. focusing on highest possible mid-range torque for hiway rpm in a heavy vehicle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trick Flow intake problems | shacar87 | Windsor Power | 9 | 11-14-2003 05:53 PM |
New Intake with NITROUS!!!???? | NOSstang08690 | Power Adders | 9 | 09-09-2003 07:05 AM |
intake | ghostfacedriver | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 08-26-2003 07:16 AM |
stock GT40 head intake runner opening | mak375 | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-07-2003 09:14 PM |
Head and intake flow. Something to think about. :) | 5ohCOUPE | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-16-2003 08:52 AM |