MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-16-2002, 10:08 PM   #1
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default Combustion chamber size

I have a cylinder head dilemma going on here. I really like the trick flow TW series but I don't like the idea of having a 61cc combustion chamber. The only thing that I have found with a 58cc chamber are the GT-40x heads. But of course they $1250 versus the 1100 for the TF's. With the 3cc difference how much difference in Compression ratio are we talking? A stock bottom end. Also what would the power difference be? I have no plans whatsoever for a blower down the road. So I do want relatively high compression. Like 10:1. I do however plan on getting at least a dry 75 shot of N20. What do you guys suggest? I just can't make up my mind. I am using the trick flow street heat intake with the trick flow #1 cam.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2002, 10:17 PM   #2
82 GT
Import Slayer
 
82 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
Default

Ask Mach1, he seems to know everything about everything.
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator.
82 GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2002, 10:29 PM   #3
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Running 61cc chambers versus 58cc chambers, all other things being equal, will result in approx. .334 decrease in compression.

If you're not planning on adding any boost, I'd go for a goal of 10.5:1 compression. But that's just me.

Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 06:43 AM   #4
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

Well, I was thinking that 10:1 would be a little better than 10.5:1 since I am planning on using nitrous. But if you think 10.5 is okay with nitrous, then I will consider it. What would the compression ratio be using 58cc heads? Thanks.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 07:07 AM   #5
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ieatcamaros
What would the compression ratio be using 58cc heads? Thanks.
Good morning. When you add the typical space for the head gasket and the 4 valve reliefs in the piston top, and the the space above the top ring, 58cc heads on a stock bottom end will give you a 9.44:1 compression ratio.



Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 01:24 PM   #6
BilLster
Registered Member
 
BilLster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ontario canada
Posts: 446
Default

you could always mill the tw heads to raise compression or wait
and select pistons to raise it for your combo.
__________________
89 with 331 t3'/t4 hybrids. upr Suspention worked out finnaly . 9.89 144 mph .
BilLster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 04:08 PM   #7
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

I thought about milling the trick flows, but I don't know the formula for calculating how much to take off in order to get the right combustion chamber size. I am a machinist, but I don't do auto machine work. Where I work, we do shut down and rebuild type work for other places. Anyhow, Chris could you be kind enough to share with me the formula you used to figure that compression ratio? Also, I didn't understand the 4 valve reliefs in each piston. There are only two valves per cylinder. Wouldn't the extra notches make me lose compression?
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 05:19 PM   #8
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

4 notches means the same piston can be used in any cylinder.

The formula is as follows:

Cylinder volume for a 302 is 617.78cc.
The space above the top ring, and the space for the 4 notches, is 5.5cc.
The average head gasket has a crushed thickness of .047", which equals 9.68cc.
Your combustion chamber size is 58cc.
Add them all together and you have total cylinder volume:

617.78 + 5.5 + 9.68 + 58 = 690.97cc

Now, you divide that number by the total volume above the piston, or

58 + 5.5 + 9.68 = 73.19cc

690.97cc / 73.19cc = 9.4407705:1 Compression Ratio.



Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 06:07 PM   #9
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

Thanks Chris, you are the man! After I posted that question about the 4 notches, I got to thinking about it. And I figured that 4 notches meant you could use it in any cylinder. That was the only logical reason I could think of myself. BTW, do you have a formula to figure on how much it would take to mill off the trick flows to get a 58cc chamber? I know that all heads are different in chamber shape. So of course this would only work for the trick flows. Thanks again.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 06:49 PM   #10
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

A straight cut of .020" would reduce the chamber to approx 57.92cc.

Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 10:23 PM   #11
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

D*mn Chris! It ain't the first time you've heard this and it certainly ain't the last. But we are very lucky to have you on our board. You da man!

I thought it would take a lot more than .02 to reduce the chamber size down to 58cc. I was thinkin at least .05. Now, if I cut .02 off the heads then I will have to have larger notches in the pistons. Right? I am pretty sure. But, Trick Flow says that the pistons don't need notching the way they have the valves set up. So, my question is, can I buy regular notched pistons from summit? Like I said in my first post of this thread, I am using the trick flow #1 cam. JIC, it is 275/279 with 1.6 rockers the lift is .499/.510.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 12:04 AM   #12
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Now you're crossing into territory I don't feel comfortable enough to advise you in. Try calling Trick Flow.

Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 02:57 PM   #13
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

I am pretty sure that I am going to go with the windsor jr. heads because they have the 58cc chamber and 1.94/1.60 valves. They will accept a cam with a lift up to .560" Even though they are cast iron. Weight is not my concern, but weight transfer is. What do you think of what combo I have come up with.

Windsor jr cast iron heads mentioned above.
Trick Flow #1 cam.
1.6 rollers.
Trick Flow street heat.

I think that is the cam I want with those heads. The thing I can't get straight is the intake. I am thinkin that maybe the cobra might be a better intake. What I am looking for is a street beast with a lot of lower end torque. I am a stop light to stop light kinda guy with occasional visits to the track. Also, I am probably going to add a shot of nitrous. Don't know what size, but it will be a dry kit since I am a nitrous newbie.

Ideas and suggestions are appreciated.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 04:51 PM   #14
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

I like the GT40, personally.

Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 06:18 PM   #15
gtsr515
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
Default

Me too, GT-40 heads perform so well I don't care what you do to them.

How ya been Chris?, been away awhile.

How's the dirt? still flyin' I'm sure, hey Chris, what effect does temperature have on dirt trackin'? do you have to deal with tire issues and suspension set-up with extreme temps or no?

My guess is hot weather would give you more traction because the track could be "bit" harder by your tires. Right or wrong?

Cold would make the track "harder?" thus slippery?

Later EECbreath!
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers!
gtsr515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 06:31 PM   #16
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

Quote:
Me too, GT-40 heads perform so well I don't care what you do to them.
I think he was talking about the intake manifold.

Anyway, why the GT-40 Chris? I already have the street heat. But if I was buying a new one, the gt-40 is $200 more.

I think the street heat will give me the most low and mid range power, but you know more than me. Which gaskets should I use? The ones to fit the intake or the heads. I assume which ever one requires less cutting. Thanks.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 09:51 PM   #17
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by gtsr515
Me too, GT-40 heads perform so well I don't care what you do to them.

How ya been Chris?, been away awhile.

How's the dirt? still flyin' I'm sure, hey Chris, what effect does temperature have on dirt trackin'? do you have to deal with tire issues and suspension set-up with extreme temps or no?

My guess is hot weather would give you more traction because the track could be "bit" harder by your tires. Right or wrong?

Cold would make the track "harder?" thus slippery?

Later EECbreath!
Hotter air temp usually means the track will dry out faster, and a dry track creates a condition known as dry slick. The best traction comes from a damp, tacky track. Put it this way; if the track tries to suck the shoes off your feet when you walk across it, it's perfect.



Take care,
-Chris

Ieatcamaros-
I prefer the Gt40 for personal reasons. I try not to make specific parts recommedations or horsepower estimates. There are too many variables. You'll be fine with what you have.

~C
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2002, 10:30 AM   #18
Ieatcamaros
Domestic Rice really sucks!
 
Ieatcamaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 973
Default

Quote:
I try not to make specific parts recommedations or horsepower estimates.
I understand that fully. Thanks for your input.
__________________
The sig says it all.
Ieatcamaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2002, 11:48 AM   #19
Mustangbelle306
Yay for Chickys
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,532
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PKRWUD

Ieatcamaros-
I prefer the Gt40 for personal reasons. I try not to make specific parts recommedations or horsepower estimates. There are too many variables. You'll be fine with what you have.

~C
That's a good way to be, Chris. Just an easy way to start arguments with some people, even if the GT40s WOULD be a better choice .

What is a recommended compression ratio to run if you plan on adding forced induction later? I'm trying to read and learn about heads so my decison won't be made with personal opinions from others, but I'm still pretty much in the dark.

82gt, I think this board has endured enough of your personal vendatta. Please stop already
Mustangbelle306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2002, 03:52 PM   #20
Mach 1
Registered Member
 
Mach 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 82 GT
Ask Mach1, he seems to know everything about everything.
Interesting. 82 GT sent me a private message apoligising for his remarks in the thread about selling a car, stateing that he tends to lose his head and that he was wrong, and then he turns around and pulls some crap like this?

Whats the matter with you anyway?

I guess he is another one to never be trusted. Is there any real, honest people left in America? Seriously....Im so tired of the "stab you in the back losers" out there, guess 82 GT is no different than the majority of people out there anymore. Maybe I just expect too much from people?
__________________
2002 GT
1993 GT (SOLD)
'93 Mustang GT
RHC member #142
Mach 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a formula for figuring combustion chamber volume? skiwesser Windsor Power 1 05-02-2003 06:09 PM
combustion chamber lx5091 Windsor Power 4 10-13-2002 08:25 PM
wheel size fordkid68 Stang Stories 0 03-13-2002 07:14 PM
combustion chamber size of..... avbcon12 Windsor Power 3 02-12-2002 08:35 PM
1 chamber or 2 chamber flowmaster mufflers pete1 Windsor Power 1 09-02-2001 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM.


SEARCH