

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1
|
![]() For some time now I have been looking for an old 1967 or 68' Fastback to either buy or restore because I just love their classic look. I have recently found a 66' fastback without an engine or transmission but the body is in pretty good condition. I was have a few different questions I would like to ask. First, what are the differences between the bodies of the 67+68 as compared to the 66'? Next, I hear that cheap classic mustangs needing to be restored are hard to come by and a rare comodity. Should I get this 66' because my chances of finding a 67' or 68' are bad? If I fix up the 66' what kind of engine should I put in? (If it is hard or to expensive to go original, then I just want power. Is it hard and/or expensive to go with the original trans and engine, or should I go with a newer more powerful engine? Finally, this is probably just a matter of opinion, but... is the 66' fastback a prized mustang like the 67 or 68? As I said I was hoping for a 67 or 68, but from the pictures I have seen of the 66, I think I could just as easily settle for it. Any information would be helpful. Thanks.
Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 mustang | jomac01 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 05-23-2004 07:54 PM |
Mw | cyberstang5.0 | Blue Oval Lounge | 4 | 08-22-2003 09:25 PM |
Woodward Dream Cruise - 2003 | drudis | Ford Show & Go | 0 | 07-24-2003 08:53 AM |
89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang | Five0 | Stang Stories | 7 | 04-01-2001 02:50 AM |
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. | Taqus | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 01-17-2001 02:39 AM |