HELP disappointing time slips!!!!

skiwesser · 01-22-2007, 11:08 PM

Yes, I am very pleased with the results, car drives better all the way around, mores streetable too.
The graph he printed shows pull #2 at 288hp and #6 (last pull) 300.97hp,
seems he only ran it 4 or 5 times but mabye 6, in 4 changes he only got 12hp,but he may have tried some curves that lost power and I didn't notice, but the 1st pull after he cleared the memory on the CPU he baslined with A9P stock cpu maps (he told me the auto cpu's are more agressive than a A9L manual box?) anyway pull one was like 168hp give or take.
P.S. I have a t-5 upgraded to 91 or whatever year the torque rating went to 300lbs (stronger 2nd and 3rd)
I HOPE I DON'T GRENADE IT!!!!!! TOO SOON........

USMC302 · 01-31-2007, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skiwesser

P.S. I have a t-5 upgraded to 91 or whatever year the torque rating went to 300lbs (stronger 2nd and 3rd)
I HOPE I DON'T GRENADE IT!!!!!! TOO SOON........

Funny you mention that, every tranny is different although rated the closely the same. I had a buddy blow his and he wasn't pushing more than 250rwhp. Knock on wood, but my tranny is the only thing stock on my car. It's got some low 11 sec passes on it with some 1.6 60ft's. I even had to run my 17inch 99 cobra wheels (heavy as sh*t) at a FFW event and pulled them off the ground. Launched at 5500 rpms. Ole faithfull T5 still going! lol

01-22-2007, 11:08 PM	#1
skiwesser Registered Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: rock hill,S.C. 29730 Posts: 420	Re: HELP disappointing time slips!!!! Yes, I am very pleased with the results, car drives better all the way around, mores streetable too. The graph he printed shows pull #2 at 288hp and #6 (last pull) 300.97hp, seems he only ran it 4 or 5 times but mabye 6, in 4 changes he only got 12hp,but he may have tried some curves that lost power and I didn't notice, but the 1st pull after he cleared the memory on the CPU he baslined with A9P stock cpu maps (he told me the auto cpu's are more agressive than a A9L manual box?) anyway pull one was like 168hp give or take. P.S. I have a t-5 upgraded to 91 or whatever year the torque rating went to 300lbs (stronger 2nd and 3rd) I HOPE I DON'T GRENADE IT!!!!!! TOO SOON........ __________________ 88 GT: subs,pullies, 1 3/4 longtubes, flowmasters, AFR 165's,T,F #1 cam,Thyphoon intake, 24# inj., 73mm C&L,65mmT.B., 190LPH pump, Eagle sir rods, forged pistons in a newly rebuilt 306. DYNO TUNED TO 300.97 RWHP 337RWTQ

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Back from the track....did worse than last time!!	82 GT	Windsor Power	18	05-12-2005 10:21 PM
Long Time No Post	OnMy3rdStang	Blue Oval Lounge	4	12-05-2004 10:34 PM
My report from racing at the NMRA event in Bowling Green (was ATTN: Lt. Dan)	andy669	Racer's Club House	12	10-08-2003 02:41 PM
Have not had race in a long time.	Five0	Stang Stories	2	12-23-2001 11:50 PM
Towed away this time! (Long)	1988GTCONERTIBLE	Windsor Power	6	10-26-2001 06:05 PM