

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Charlottesville, Va, USA
Posts: 328
|
![]() I agree with the above post. With the intercooler you would make less power b/c the motor has to work that much harder to get the air it needs.
------------------ '93 LX 425rwhp/410rwtq |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yeah, he runs 11.0's.... Naturally Aspirated! | Fox Body | Windsor Power | 26 | 11-15-2003 12:15 AM |
14 lb intercooled procharger | kenneth kimble | Windsor Power | 4 | 08-23-2002 10:03 AM |
Procharger D-1SC intercooled on a 351W | Fox Body | Windsor Power | 5 | 06-12-2002 05:35 PM |
Aftercooled Vortech S-Trim vs. Intercooled Procharger P1-SC | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 1 | 02-14-2002 01:25 AM |
2.3 intercooled turbo in a ranger | exgmguy | Small Ponies | 1 | 03-08-1999 04:37 AM |