

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 48
|
![]() It's fairly accurate if you use good input data, i.e. head flow numbers, cam specs. For some of the mid-runner length intakes like Performer RPM and Track Heat I've taken the average of the Tuned Port and Sequential Fire fuel injection intake options. Also, I'm not crazy on the header/exhaust choices: it's kind of a guessing game. The roller lifter option models all roller cams as solid roller, which overestimates ramp rate and rpm potential of hydraulic roller cams. Try experimenting with the solid lifter to better estimate hot hydraulic roller cams.
Play with it a while to see how the numbers turn out before you use it as a tuning tool. Once you figure out all the subtle nuances, it's pretty handy to have and use. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rare Mustangs....Got One? | 1969Mach1 | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 09-25-2010 04:59 AM |
raced a Supra Twin Turbo | Stang35th | Stang Stories | 63 | 08-23-2003 12:36 AM |