Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
02-23-2002, 09:15 PM
|
#10 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Hayes, Va, USA
Posts: 798
|
A 454, 455, and 502 have worse R/S ratios IMO its a moot point in the general sense.
If your building a super-charged engine with nitrous, why even worry about a stroker? your only gaining a measly 43 cubes with a stock bore. (not knocking a 347, I'm building one myself). If'n I wuz U, I would check out a niv\ce siamese bore block that could take a healthy over-bore. A 4.125 bore and a 3.00 stroke gives you 320 cubes. I think a blower/nitrous car would benefit more from the unshrouding than increasing the stroke? Stuff it with a stock length rod and a beefy custom reverse dome piston with a nice thick crown.
__________________
2002 5M GT (99% stock) 1991 5M LX (30% stock) patiently awaiting my satin silver 07 Mach 1, and don't forget the shaker |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Building a stroker motor | Mustang_289 | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-17-2005 12:46 PM |
| 'super' stroker vs 'budget' stroker | mike5p01 | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-11-2003 10:11 PM |
| 351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
| Decided to build a stroker, but where do I start? | WhiteLX | Windsor Power | 5 | 12-16-2002 10:35 AM |
| stroker engine question | 82 GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 06-08-2001 03:22 PM |