MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-21-2002, 07:34 PM   #2
red82gt
Sober voice of Reason
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
Default

I'm pretty sure I saw someone running a plate system with a performer RPM at a car show, I don't know if they had to modify it or not. I remember your earlier post about wanting to use a Torker II. If your main concern is performance on the nitrous, that manifold would be a better choice but it wouldn't have the throttle response on the street.
However, bleeding off some of the low end torque is a good way to increase traction and since you'll be above 4000 rpms after first gear, you won't miss the loss in low speed torque.
Basically, I don't agree with the others that the torker II is a bad manifold and I think with a nitroused street car its a pretty trick piece.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600.
red82gt is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford Performer RPM Heads Scrapla Windsor Power 6 02-19-2004 09:53 AM
Performer VS. Performer RPM IMPULSERACING Windsor Power 8 02-09-2001 12:45 PM
Performer RPM vs. Track Heat which is better for my setup? MY91GT Windsor Power 0 01-19-2001 12:52 PM
does gt40 intake work with sn95? daz95gt Windsor Power 8 01-13-2001 08:20 AM
Performer RPM or Stealth Dangerous Dave Windsor Power 1 01-11-2001 11:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.


SEARCH