

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#2 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() I'm pretty sure I saw someone running a plate system with a performer RPM at a car show, I don't know if they had to modify it or not. I remember your earlier post about wanting to use a Torker II. If your main concern is performance on the nitrous, that manifold would be a better choice but it wouldn't have the throttle response on the street.
However, bleeding off some of the low end torque is a good way to increase traction and since you'll be above 4000 rpms after first gear, you won't miss the loss in low speed torque. Basically, I don't agree with the others that the torker II is a bad manifold and I think with a nitroused street car its a pretty trick piece.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ford Performer RPM Heads | Scrapla | Windsor Power | 6 | 02-19-2004 09:53 AM |
Performer VS. Performer RPM | IMPULSERACING | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-09-2001 12:45 PM |
Performer RPM vs. Track Heat which is better for my setup? | MY91GT | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-19-2001 12:52 PM |
does gt40 intake work with sn95? | daz95gt | Windsor Power | 8 | 01-13-2001 08:20 AM |
Performer RPM or Stealth | Dangerous Dave | Windsor Power | 1 | 01-11-2001 11:45 PM |