

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Sustained 8500-9000rpms? LOL, hell no! I was making fun of the idea. My engine held together, luckily for me, and it didn't see that kind of rpm for more than a split second as the howling of tire and slipping of clutch allowed me to hit the clutch again a hair after it grabbed.
Mora, you're a total idiot. Weight doesn't affect top speed worth mentioning. It affects acceleration. Using a fox body Mustang for a top speed run? Are you an idiot? (Wait, I've already answered that question, see reference at the beginning of this paragraph.) The Fox Mustang is a brick. It'll take better than 700hp to hit 200mph with it, regardless of weight. Go read a physics book. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 10-28-2002 04:57 PM |
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |
RPM difference between 3.73 to 4.10 | o2superstang | Modular Madness | 0 | 07-09-2002 06:58 PM |