

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#2 |
Procharged!
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 1,539
|
![]() Well I like the SSMs but you should re-enforce the torque boxes as a precaution they do add stress to the boxes. As long as you keep them greased they aren't that loud. Ever since I added my torque box kit I have never had any issues with my SSM bars tearing the box up.
I really don't like the Lakewood bars because they are like the old school traction bars and the rubber feet slam against the thin floor pan. Subframes would be a good idea anyway to try to reduce some of the twist in the uni-frame. You should pick up a few tenths with the bars, although a lot of ET would be in a set of ET STREETS, then you will see the full benifits. You could weld plates across the stock uppers to make them more solid also and save a few bucks...
__________________
D/R 10108 NMRA Drag Radial, 25.5 chassis, F1R Check out RNH Performance Performance Engines and Custom Fabrication. From Mild to Wild we can build what you want, when you want it. FOR SALE Stainless Steel Torque Box Supports |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSM Liftbars Vs. Lakewood Liftbars, And A Quick Clutch Adjustment Question. | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-30-2002 06:56 AM |
liftbars and shocks are on, some difference | gray87GT | Windsor Power | 0 | 06-04-2001 07:31 AM |