Hybrid Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
05-09-2001, 03:51 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 1,631
|
I think they'd work very well...better than a pair of 165s just so long as you have a cam and intake setup that will allow you to flow the air and fuel required to make those heads scream. And remember, stroker engines are much more forgiving of cams than smaller engines. Don't be afraid to pick one that would seem big for a 302.
------------------ 1984 1/2 GT350 (#842 Hatchback w/ T-tops), 302HO, Comp cams Xtreme Energy cam, Carter 625cfm carb, Weiand Stealth intake, MSD distributor, MSD coil, FMS 9mm wires, 1 5/8" MAC unequal shorties, 2 1/2" MAC Prochamber H-pipe, Flowmaster 2 chambers, KYBs, 16"x8" 4 lug Cobra Rs, Falken 245/45ZR16s |
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Blown Stroker Computer Help | RabidPony | Modular Madness | 10 | 02-07-2004 11:56 PM |
| 'super' stroker vs 'budget' stroker | mike5p01 | Windsor Power | 4 | 10-11-2003 10:11 PM |
| 351w or 347 stroker? which is better? | BLACK85GT | Windsor Power | 55 | 12-21-2002 06:52 PM |
| Decided to build a stroker, but where do I start? | WhiteLX | Windsor Power | 5 | 12-16-2002 10:35 AM |
| stroker engine question | 82 GT | Windsor Power | 1 | 06-08-2001 03:22 PM |