
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 351
|
Ford rates the 2.3 t-5's at 240 ft-lbs
the 5.0 t-5's from 85-89 were rated at 265 the 5.0's from 90-93 were rated at 300 ft-lbs for the 90-93's there was a higher nickel content in the gearset so the metal was actually stronger. as for the 2.3's, I think they had the weaker alloy as well Also a smaller shaft diameter would be weaker than the larger shaft although I don't think the shaft is the weakest part. The higher gear ratio itself would also make the tranny weaker. with the same input torque, the higher gear ratio would produce a higher output torque. think about the gears in a rear end. It is alot easier to break the tires loose with 4.10's than it is with 2.73's, same thing with tranny gears except it's not just the tires breaking loose.
__________________
![]() '88 lx, Black on Black, check it out here Spent all my money on school, what a dumb mistake I'm old enough to know better, but still too young to care. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T-5 Dead Change to 4cyl Tranny?? | raptor | Windsor Power | 5 | 06-18-2003 03:08 AM |
| 4cyl. T-5 transmission **HELP** | crazyhumpyd | Windsor Power | 6 | 04-27-2002 10:08 PM |
| Do You Have 4cyl Springs On Your 5.0? If So, Please Help Me With Some Questions. | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 2 | 04-01-2002 10:40 AM |
| Converted 4cyl to 5.0 emissions question | BoveK | Windsor Power | 0 | 02-02-2002 10:14 AM |
| Installing 5.0 in a 4cyl frame | pxcr_600 | Windsor Power | 6 | 11-19-2001 02:39 PM |
