

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Anderson, TX.
Posts: 166
|
![]() Is there any performance gains to relocating the ACT sensor? I have heard people say that relocating it to the intake tube gives a better reading of the actual air temp than being in the intake manifold where it is a lot warmer. Any truth to this? It kind of makes sense, but you would think that the factory would account for the extra heat in the manifold.
__________________
331 10:1, AFR 185's, TFS-R intake |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GT40 vs Stock lower intake difference | ca_mustang | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-02-2004 05:03 PM |
non egr explorer intake | MidNiteBlu 5.0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 01-30-2004 08:48 AM |
HP Question on Combo Cam, upper, lower intake. Work starts Monday | 89FHPLX | Windsor Power | 7 | 01-08-2002 01:42 AM |
explorer intake | myred86gt | Windsor Power | 4 | 09-26-2001 12:18 AM |
lower intake gaskets? will they work? | DemonGT | Windsor Power | 3 | 06-08-2001 06:40 PM |