
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 1,511
|
Well the stock rocker arms are stamped...so a roller rocker is far superior to that. The bearings and the whole design is much better. I don't know if you'll get any performance gain from switching to 1.6rr. Besides the benifits of reduced friction and all that good stuff. But the increased ratio of a 1.7 with give you some additional lift.
-Ryan
__________________
89GT,Pro-Bullet 306, H/C/I and a bunch of other stuff. *Sold* 00GT, Vortech S-Trim, Steeda Boost Pipe, C&L intake, Mac off-road H-pipe, Flowmasters, B&M Ripper shifter, Eibach Sportline springs, Koni Struts/shocks, MM full length subframe connectors, Cobra brakes, 3.73's. My Car Domain Page |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Roller rockers for stock heads | QuantumMotorsports | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-14-2003 03:15 PM |
| Roller Rockers, bad? | HiFlow5 0 | Windsor Power | 1 | 04-14-2002 01:35 PM |
| roller rockers | bobtodd | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-07-2002 01:34 PM |
| reg rockers or roller rockers?? | Chevysucks | Windsor Power | 1 | 12-05-2001 08:17 PM |
| Valve Springs & Roller Rockers | StreetStang37 | Windsor Power | 4 | 04-17-2001 03:54 AM |
