

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() I think at least some of the extra weight is in stronger main bearing webs. For your intended application (power adder, etc.), the minimal extra weight would be an advantage rather than a disadvantage.
Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe Last edited by Rev; 09-26-2004 at 05:07 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
weight reduction on a 94 cobra | mak375 | Windsor Power | 2 | 11-21-2003 10:20 AM |
88workcar-? reducing weight | Simi Stang | Windsor Power | 10 | 11-08-2002 05:55 PM |
Please Comment of Speed Secret # 2 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 20 | 11-06-2002 11:44 AM |
351 Windsor motor weight vs 302 5.0 weight????? | ELBGATOR3 | Windsor Power | 1 | 03-12-2001 12:07 AM |
Weight and Weight Distribution | 97snakedriver | Corner Carvers Delight | 4 | 01-11-2001 12:21 PM |