

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13
|
![]() I have to agree with Dark5.0. I had each of them (GT 40 and Cobra) on a 89 convertable at one point or another and there was virtually no performance difference between the two of them. The car ran a 13.10 with the Gt 40 and a 13.20 with the cobra, MPH was virtually the same at 107 GT and 104 with the cobra, both of those were best times, no slicks and I couldn't hook up at all. I walked it out of the hole, but still spun pretty badly till the top of 3rd gear, I think I had like a 2.10 60 FT time) I like the cobra best as well, the GT40 may be a couple of pounds lighter, but that's about it. Honestly, if I were you, I would look into Edelbrock's intakes for the 5.0. Their performer RPMII is a damn nice intake that performs well. (A friend of mine works for a speed shop, and I have seen various ones dyno tested), just some food for thought.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GT-40 Long Block and Cobra Intake | RMARIANI | Windsor Power | 12 | 04-21-2004 12:55 PM |
'02 GT Drop top Vs. '94 Cobra | EZRIDN | Stang Stories | 3 | 03-26-2004 04:23 PM |
HP limit of cobra upper intake. | Dark_5.0 | Windsor Power | 3 | 03-03-2004 10:03 AM |
Cobra Engine Swap...Ways to improve my 98 GT... | xtrememach1racer | Modular Madness | 3 | 10-31-2002 11:23 AM |
Cobra Intake? | 95mustanggt | Windsor Power | 5 | 10-01-2002 09:55 AM |