MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-16-2006, 01:20 AM   #1
82 GT
Import Slayer
 
82 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
Default Re: what cam should i use on my 92 gt

It all depends on how long the intake and exhaust valves hang open. I've seen cams with lifts as high as .565-.580 with no piston to valve clearance issues simply because the duration was not very long. I admit, most of these cams I speak about were custom cams. It's all in the lobe design on how quick the valves open and closes(duration as most of us call it).

Think of it this way: Suppose you were trying to wack my hand with a hammer before I pulled it back. It's not how far I reach my hand out...it's how long I leave it out there before you get a chance to wack it. Now suppose that the timing of me putting my hand out and you swinging the hammer(and missing) is the same sequence over and over again just like the valve timing of an engine....you always come close but always juuuuust miss me.
Now say I decide to leave my hand out there(same distance) for a split second longer(more duration) and your swinging timing is the same......BAM.....Smashed fingers!!
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator.
82 GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 01:55 AM   #2
1989GT
Registered Member
 
1989GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 1,511
Default Re: what cam should i use on my 92 gt

Quote:
I've seen cams with lifts as high as .565-.580 with no piston to valve clearance issues simply because the duration was not very long.
By the same token you could run .500 lift and a longer duration and not have piston to valve clearance issues.
Quote:
Think of it this way: Suppose you were trying to wack my hand with a hammer before I pulled it back. It's not how far I reach my hand out...it's how long I leave it out there before you get a chance to wack it. Now suppose that the timing of me putting my hand out and you swinging the hammer(and missing) is the same sequence over and over again just like the valve timing of an engine....you always come close but always juuuuust miss me.
So now what happens when you stick your hand out further(lift) but leave your had out there for the same amount of time(duration) It'll take you longer to get you hand out of the danger zone because you stuck it out further. So now your fingers get smashed.
__________________
89GT,Pro-Bullet 306, H/C/I and a bunch of other stuff. *Sold*

00GT, Vortech S-Trim, Steeda Boost Pipe, C&L intake, Mac off-road H-pipe, Flowmasters, B&M Ripper shifter, Eibach Sportline springs, Koni Struts/shocks, MM full length subframe connectors, Cobra brakes, 3.73's.
My Car Domain Page
1989GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 08:53 AM   #3
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default Re: what cam should i use on my 92 gt

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989GT
By the same token you could run .500 lift and a longer duration and not have piston to valve clearance issues.

So now what happens when you stick your hand out further(lift) but leave your had out there for the same amount of time(duration) It'll take you longer to get you hand out of the danger zone because you stuck it out further. So now your fingers get smashed.
I am with this guy.

I have seen cams not clear with 1.7 roller rockers that will clear with 1.6 roller rockers.

Mill your heads 40 thousanths like my old E7's were and you will notice that you cant get away with near as much lift. This wouldnt be the case if "82GT" was correct.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002 GT vs 1987 GT Review LONG Unit 5302 Blue Oval Lounge 11 06-09-2002 05:29 PM
Raced a 99 GT 5-speed StoplightWarrior Stang Stories 4 05-15-2002 09:13 PM
1988 Gt - 1998 Gt Hp Each Year steedamustang01 Modular Madness 13 05-09-2002 07:26 PM
RESULTS - Grand Prix GT vs. Celica GTS 302 LX Eric Stang Stories 7 09-25-2001 06:46 PM
Just got my '89 GT! Time slip guesses? 84stangLX Blue Oval Lounge 6 07-25-2001 09:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.


SEARCH