

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() One also might remember that dynamic CR is not the same as static CR. As RPM increases, dynamic CR would be better at increased RPM because there is not any reversion into the intake. CR inceases with (boost+14.7)/14.7 X CR = actual CR. eg. (8 lbs.boost+14.7)/14.7 X 10 = 15.44 CR. This does apply to dynamiic CR which changes over the RPM range. Does this make sense?
Rev ------------------ '66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph 1/4 mi. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
increasing compression ratio | 84LX89GT | Windsor Power | 6 | 11-14-2003 10:40 AM |
Air/fuel ratio problems | Ripon | Windsor Power | 8 | 02-28-2002 03:32 PM |
GOT A 351..stroke it? rod ratio q's | LX XLR8R | Windsor Power | 5 | 10-25-2001 08:58 AM |
Whats the best way to tell if your running lean or rich? | K.C. 5.0 | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-10-2001 03:04 PM |
Air/Fuel Ratio gauge | gray87GT | Windsor Power | 9 | 05-16-2001 05:17 PM |