MAF Choices??

GhOsT6_9 · 05-25-2004, 07:19 PM

I'm lookin to upgrade my stock MAF to something bigger, but I don't know which company to go with.

I'm currently leaning towards the C&L 76mm w/inlet pipe kit.

Doesn't anyone know of any good or bad thing with these meters, or know of a meter that is better then this one??

Any info would be great.

RPM427 · 05-25-2004, 09:26 PM

C&L worked great on my 91 GT.

LX5liter · 05-29-2004, 08:28 AM

Pro-M is good, but if you change injector sizes you have to have it re-calibrated instead of just buying a new sample tube. I've heard good and bad about both brands.

canukracer · 05-29-2004, 04:25 PM

I got the 76mm and inlet pipe works good so far! you use your old maf sensor in it so it's mostly the increased size and the tuned pipe

jonnyk · 05-29-2004, 04:55 PM

I went from the C&L 76 + inlet to a Pro-M Univer and noticed that it idles smoother now, but no changes otherwise. Both have been great to me.

95mustanggt · 06-02-2004, 11:56 AM

I have a Pro-M, car idles great, no complaints.

Capri306 · 06-03-2004, 02:54 AM

I had a Pro-M meter, and it seemed to work very well both in the way the car performed and according to the infrared exhaust gas analyzer.

But yes, you do have to have it recalibrated for different injector sizes, which ain't cheap if you continuously change injectors....but then again, if you change them that often, you more than likely have the bills to have it recalibrated, no?

FYI, the rumor mill said that the Pro-M's made more HP by having a slightly leaner ratio at the top end. Nothing to support those claims -- as I said, the analyzer said everything was okay -- but I've heard that from more than one person. Anyone else?

05-25-2004, 07:19 PM	#1
GhOsT6_9 Registered Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Ontario,Canada Posts: 233	MAF Choices?? I'm lookin to upgrade my stock MAF to something bigger, but I don't know which company to go with. I'm currently leaning towards the C&L 76mm w/inlet pipe kit. Doesn't anyone know of any good or bad thing with these meters, or know of a meter that is better then this one?? Any info would be great. __________________ 1989 Mustang LX Notch 5.0L, T-5, 1969 351W heads, cut & welded stock plenum, F-303 cam, Mac 1 5/8 full length headers, Cat'd H-pipe, 3.73 gears, Underdrives, SSM lift bars, E-Fan, 3G Alt, Custom Chip, Autometer gauges, Weld Draglite wheels , M/T ET Street Radials Best 1/4: 13.33@101.53MPH

05-25-2004, 09:26 PM	#2
RPM427 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Huntington NY Posts: 573	C&L worked great on my 91 GT. __________________ -1993 Mustang, 900rwhp 03-04 cobra based 4v swap, full Griggs setup, project underway -1994 Ranger w/ 427cid windsor (daily beater) check it out!

05-29-2004, 08:28 AM	#3
LX5liter dude5l Join Date: May 2001 Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada Posts: 603	Pro-M is good, but if you change injector sizes you have to have it re-calibrated instead of just buying a new sample tube. I've heard good and bad about both brands. __________________ Good luck! Brad R. 1992 L.X. 5.0 coupe MODS: A few little bolt ons New Best time ...11.60 @ 128 mph @ 2000+ ft altitude. Rice Haters Club member #39 Users rides #2542

05-29-2004, 04:55 PM	#5
jonnyk Being stroked is great Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 772	I went from the C&L 76 + inlet to a Pro-M Univer and noticed that it idles smoother now, but no changes otherwise. Both have been great to me. __________________ Novi 2000 now spinning off the snout of the 331... Mods Pics

06-02-2004, 11:56 AM	#6
95mustanggt Registered Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Kamloops, BC Posts: 2,875	I have a Pro-M, car idles great, no complaints. __________________ 1995 Mustang GT 20016 F150 Lariat Super Crew

05-29-2004, 04:25 PM	#4
canukracer Registered Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: alberta canada Posts: 108	I got the 76mm and inlet pipe works good so far! you use your old maf sensor in it so it's mostly the increased size and the tuned pipe

06-03-2004, 02:54 AM	#7
Capri306 Moderator Join Date: Sep 1998 Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA Posts: 1,001	I had a Pro-M meter, and it seemed to work very well both in the way the car performed and according to the infrared exhaust gas analyzer. But yes, you do have to have it recalibrated for different injector sizes, which ain't cheap if you continuously change injectors....but then again, if you change them that often, you more than likely have the bills to have it recalibrated, no? FYI, the rumor mill said that the Pro-M's made more HP by having a slightly leaner ratio at the top end. Nothing to support those claims -- as I said, the analyzer said everything was okay -- but I've heard that from more than one person. Anyone else? __________________ Capri306, Moderator The Mustang Works Online 1979 Mercury Capri 1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback 1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Rear End Choices	RoadWarrior	Windsor Power	5	08-30-2002 10:48 AM
supercharging choices	chiaronate	Windsor Power	13	07-09-2002 08:17 PM
choices choices	66StangGuy	Classic Mustangs	7	05-10-2002 02:03 PM
Why GOD, Why???? Tooo many choices!!!	jerryIII	Windsor Power	3	06-04-2001 11:06 PM
Plug choices?	slo95	Windsor Power	2	03-08-2001 08:52 PM